Should I be guaranteeing concurrent users for client?

A client require SLA that guarantees usage of an X degree of concurrent users. Do you find it normal to offer guarantees on concurrent clients in SLA in case yes, how to calculate concurrent users

Concurrent consumers for what

My respond to without knowing much info would be. Make sure ones hardware is spec’d to take care of that many users. Also make sure your customer is paying for this particular SLA.

For the web app (PHP/MySQL).

Make sure your own hardware is spec’d along with you’re charging the perfect amount to guarantee that SLA. It should be as simple while that.

Granted I have no idea what you’re loading, what it’s with regard to, what hardware it really is running on, what it can, etc.

It ought not matter what it really is, if they desire that SLA; fee accordingly.

I’m performing a fantasy football online app for client. How much regarded as a charge for SLA pertaining to concurrent users. And learn how to measure the concurrent users my server (LAMP) could support

My LAMPs
-1 apache machine (4 core 4GHZ, FOUR GB) and ONE PARTICULAR mySQL server (4 Center 4GHZ, 7GB)

Absolutely definitely not. You have no control in the programming of the customer, or the traffic being received by the server, abusive or otherwise, or anything else that could be important for having these kinds of guarantee. If it is a dedicated server, you’ll be able to guarantee they’ll obtain server they’ve called for and that the idea remains up plus functional. So many things can not work right with a regular php / mysql / light setup that there is not any reasonable way that will guarantee any particular quantity of simultaneous users.

edit: you’ll be able to just pick lots and then charge for this and consider the idea like insurance. You already know, like, calling Auto insurance an “SLA” towards crashing your vehicle. Obviously eventually it’ll happen and it’s totally beyond the control in the car company, but they can easily still charge a premium for it on the off chance they’ll should pay out.

Quote: I’m performing a fantasy football world wide web app for purchaser. How much regarded as a charge for SLA pertaining to concurrent users. And learn how to measure the concurrent users my server (LAMP) could support

My LAMPs
-1 apache machine (4 core 4GHZ, FOUR GB) and ONE PARTICULAR mySQL server (4 Center 4GHZ, 7GB)A lot is based the server configuration and also the website.

You could begin with testing it with something like ab or Load Impact for any real world solution.

Quote: A client require SLA that guarantees usage of an X degree of concurrent users. Do you find it normal to offer guarantees on concurrent clients in SLA in case yes, how to measure concurrent usersNo, it can be completely not natural.
But, I figure you can work out this numbers after adequate load testing plus a heavy premium.

If you might be offering an end to end managed service then it really is reasonable for the customer to have an expectation of the quantity of concurrent users may be supported, although this needs to be defined as part of the acceptance criteria without the other method around. Selenium is a great industry standard automation tool which may also be used for that purpose.

You can easily always add a clause to you service agreement which excludes things you might have no control over (or the location where the client is not prepared to afford mitigation) such seeing that DDOS, Hardware Inability etc.

I would check with your legal suggest regarding this. Guaranteeing fitness for any particular application (especially one you cannot control) may open you up to an array of nasty liability challenges.

Quote: I’m performing a fantasy football world wide web app for purchaser. How much regarded as a charge for SLA pertaining to concurrent users. And learn how to measure the concurrent users my server (LAMP) could support

My LAMPs
-1 apache machine (4 core 4GHZ, FOUR GB) and ONE PARTICULAR mySQL server (4 Center 4GHZ, 7GB)It’s not unusual for managed services to get provided on your per-mailbox, or per-desk, or per-transaction basis and on the limited description we have, this sounds not very much different.

If you control the complete end-to-end solution (application, national infrastructure, servers, network etc) then I don’t even think it unreasonable for any client to ask to take the risk about the hardware being inadequate.

If the required forms were the customer’s, then that is often a completely different report…..

As some have said, just make sure the liability clauses are usually clear and rational.

Quote: Absolutely not. You have no control in the programming of the customer, or the traffic being received by the server, abusive or otherwise, or anything else that could be important for having these kinds of guarantee. If it is a dedicated server, you’ll be able to guarantee they’ll obtain server they’ve called for and that the idea remains up plus functional. So many things can not work right with a regular php / mysql / light setup that there is not any reasonable way that will guarantee any particular quantity of simultaneous users.

edit: you’ll be able to just pick lots and then charge for this and consider the idea like insurance. You already know, like, calling Auto insurance an “SLA” towards crashing your vehicle. Obviously eventually it’ll happen and it’s totally beyond the control in the car company, but they can easily still charge a premium for it on the off chance they’ll should pay out. Guys he said it can be his web job application.

It really is his application thus he should absolutely be able to predict performance immediately after sufficient testing certainly.

We helpful to use QALoad for such type of testing. Of course i not able to tell you what it should be regardless of the specs you give us because it is your application. You simply must test using something like QALoad or maybe getting a lot of testers and calculating performance.

thx folks. You all tend to be awesome.

Video Streaming Using Cloud Infrastructure..!

Howdy Friends,

We are your own business Company, Working around the E-learning/M-learning Domain… So you can find lot of the actual Content like videos/Text which can be going send for you to users…
Required:
1. Hardware setup
2. Software setup

In beginning setup focus on the serving 600 customers simultaneously.. any suggestions.. in m novoice with server setup discipline…

Thanks in advance

yup that is the good idea
we employ dedicated cloud having E3-1270 server
and we create 4 personal cloud to sense of balance the load
use 4x 1tb raid 0 or even raid 1 is dependent upon you
also dont forget to work with gbit connection
1gbit as well as 2 is good

have you considered employing a CDN it is a good option should your users are positioned in different geographical places.

Probably be cheaper to make use of a CDN company that specializes with streaming like www. istreamlive. com, akamai, com, for example.

Ditlev can proper me,

But i’m sure the smart option for you will be to deploy an OnApp Hypervisor (Has being paid, Only $100USD) and utilize the OnApp CDN Market for ones videos,

I think you will discover it will be quite cheap, only paying for what get,

And you’ll be able to expand and despanding if you have more or less traffic! and Geo Target your audience!

Thanks on your ideas Friends..
But What I am looking for seriously isn’t the CDN but I would like to purchase a hardware/server in accordance with my company policy…! And I am going to use it to the streaming Contents including.. VOD(video on Demand) and stuff like this, useful for e-learning.

So will there be any specific equipment / hardware so ours.. for server software we’ll use is proabably nginx(initially) and down the line Wowza..

Any Guidelines..

Thanks in Advance

Ultimately you want to work with companies that provide quality bandwidth. Video streaming takes up plenty of bandwidth. Of course you’ll need to pay the right price to acquire quality bandwidth.

Cloud Hosting or Dedicated Hosting ? Which one is the best ?

Organisations have multiple options with regards to computer hosting treatments. Cloud hosting as well as dedicated hosting together have their own advantages and drawbacks.. Generally which is usually preferred most amongst these two for SMBs

Quote: Businesses have multiple options with regards to computer hosting treatments. Cloud hosting as well as dedicated hosting together have their own advantages and drawbacks.. Generally which is usually preferred most concerning these two for SMBs This might really depend on the type of business and envisioned growth and resource needs going forward. As with everything else, there are gonna be customers drawn to both options depending on the features and resources needed. So it’s hard to speak about one is definitely as good as the other. Nonetheless, if price is not a concern, a personal cloud with the correct configuration would offer by far the most optimal solution.

i would go cloud if you want changing resources similar to ram and hard drive space

but dedicated encourages involvement of more than one server. Hence, isn’t this beneficial for any business if it truly is providing good safety measures and control on the server Will dedicated result in any other intense problem

You could still face a problem with resources for a dedicated servers, however with cloud you should have the option to scale while you want.. but depends upon which cloud provider you choose.

Also when it comes to hardware failure, with dedicated you’re stuck until the provider resolves the matter. However with fog up (High availability), you can barely notice almost any down time.

Quote: but dedicated facilitates involvement of several server. Hence, isn’t this beneficial for any business if it truly is providing good protection and control on the server Will dedicated result in any other acute problem
So, you raised this specific question because you don’t have any practical experience with dedicated server right since you are offering fog up hosting already.

It is usually depends on what kind of business plan you’ve got and what is beneficial to you. It depends upon convenience.

hey guys as a consequence of all for your own suggestions. They were helpful

I think, that cloud internet site services are still costly and you don’t know what you’ll receive.

Cloud is way better maybe on confidential cloud with exclusive servers, when you might manage it and also you know what you’ll get.

If you have low quality then go for cloud hosting and if you want performance then choose Dedicated hosting.

Quote: Businesses have multiple options with regards to computer hosting treatments. Cloud hosting as well as dedicated hosting together have their own advantages and drawbacks.. Generally which will be preferred most between these two for SMBs SMBs might prefer dedicated hosting when they have better handle over security. In addition to, as compared to cloud, dedicated hosting gives SLA for uptime as well as hardware which would ensure it is a more powerful option than impair hosting.

I always employed cloudhosting for things i always actually needed hourly use of. As you increase more resources to some cloud server, it could quickly become considerably more expensive than a passionate of the identical or better useful resource pool.

Definitely ideal, beside the fact that one could scale your options.. its a whole lot more reliable.

They solve contrasting problems, so I say instead of picking one or other, use both!

Server Stream Download Low

Hello We’ve script in the server that would make stream download through other servers.
Many users download simultaneously

how can i tell if my personal rented server will be consuming 1Gbps.
For the same information be 1Gbps link.

inform our users are not passing to download at top speed, so do not necessarily know if it’s the fault of not necessarily achieving 1Gbps node.

I ought to reach 1Gbps genuine server in european union or canada.
1Gbps plus 30TB monthly traffic at least.

http: //lh4. googleusercontent. com/-kY… 38s/s595/1. png

Must use a good route to help Brazil.

i are afflicted by same problem

According to that particular chart, you are receiving such rates. But the mere fact that you’re peeking out during near 100MBps, tells me that your server could become overloaded and/or the port is being “plugged” with the network traffic.

What include the specs of your server It’s your decision to consider getting another server that will “offload” a few of the network traffic.

my device 1gbps not 100mpbs

my equipment load: 0. 09 0. EIGHTEEN 0. 06

There can be many factors inducing speed issues / connectivity to different aspects of the world. Perhaps you have tried contacting your ISP about this and providing them with more info to investigate.

Need review for Giga International

Hi

I have got read both optimistic and negative opinions about Giga International.

I need you help to decided.

if im on the position i will not go to that will company

1 purpose is high launch fee
2 fake unlimited offering with regard to bandwith (but 35tb inbound and 10tb Released only
its looks a bogus to me, how you certain expect 35tb connected with Inbound DDOS)
3 a lot of bad review
4 bad hardware specs

Make certain you read their TOS while they will make the server down if you are using more bandwidth.

Obviously, I don’t prefer to take my machine down. It might have been better if they charge additional funds for bandwidth even as it exceeds the limit rather than shutting down.

server4you. online is more ok than choosing giga
get that opteron with 7200rpm 2x1tb and also its cheaper
its same EU provider

try it

I believe, it is better to work with “Search” function and you may see many rewievs relating to this company.

Quote: I think, it is better to work with “Search” function and you may see many rewievs relating to this company. Before posting, I did in which!

Quote: Hi

I have got read both optimistic and negative opinions about Giga International.

I need you help to decided. Dear agriz,
if you have special questions don’t hesitate to contact our support team. We are getting excited about your request!

Have a nice day.

Suggestion Required

Hi there Friends…

This is definitely my Second Submit here…
I was looking for a VPS Node at webhostingtalk. com/showthread. phpp=8092853#post8092853 but markgrannum18 recommended me Dedicated Machine in $60 Per month at server4you. com/root-server/server-details. phpproducts=1

Can an individual tell me if it can be Good Choice running a Magento World wide web Store

Yes, That looks as being a stable server in case you have good server software. other than so it should do okay for a magento internet store.

Everything depends on configuration and optimisation. I recommend devoted server and good server management.

The server is most probably Unmanaged so you will have to know how to regulate a server that may include setting ” up “, securing, optimizing, or anything else.

It is hard to share with as the site would not say upfront whether it is absolutely managed or certainly not. It just says “Premium Support”. If you know what you are usually doing, or feel comfortable managing your personal server then do it. Plus, there a wide range of “Server Management” providers to choose from such as Platinum Host Management. But most will require the application of cPanel.

The golden rule “You get what you pay out for”.

If it’s to get a magento web keep, most likely downtime will be a huge problem for you personally. As such, a bargain basement host aren’t as appropriate to your requirements as it could be for the types of uses that can stand somewhat downtime or poor performance quite often. There are as well hosts that are dedicated to magento hosting if a quality dedicated equipment with good support isn’t as part of your budget, or if you are not totally sure the right way to manage a server alone and don’t wish to pay what managed hosting tends to cost.

Quote: If it’s to get a magento web save, most likely downtime will be a huge problem for you personally. As such, a bargain basement host aren’t as appropriate to your requirements as it could be for the types of uses that can stand somewhat downtime or poor performance quite often. There are as well hosts that are dedicated to magento hosting if a quality dedicated equipment with good support isn’t as part of your budget, or if you are not totally sure the right way to manage a server alone and don’t wish to pay what managed hosting tends to cost. I should agree with this particular statement. just understand that your store will be loosing money when down.

OP – I might also advise you to avoid that member with WHT(markgrannum18), Some of his / her judgment calls are actually questionable (using an individual core Pentium 4 as a VPS Node)

Quote: Yes, That looks as being a stable server in case you have good server software. other than so it should do okay for a magento internet store. Sorry i forgot to share the Server Configuration.
CPU
Type -> AMD Athlon II X4
Quantity -> Quad-Core
Clock Price -> 4x COUPLE OF. 3 GHz

Main Memory
Capacity -> EIGHT GB
Type -> DIMM (DDR3)

Hard Disks
Quantity -> 2
Capacity -> YOU, 000 GB
Type -> SATA, SOME, 400 rpm, EIGHT MB
RAID -> RAID YOU by software

Mainboard
Chipset -> AMD 785G
Network -> Broadcom BCM57780

Network
Data Copy -> unlimited
Type -> Flatrate
Switch Vent -> 100 MBit
External Joints -> over 160 GBit
Provider -> Deutsche Telekom, Degree 3, Global Crossing, cogent, DE-CIX, interoute,…
Uptime99%

Operating System
LinuxopenSUSE, Dime OS, Ubuntu und Debian
WindowsWebserver 2008 R2 + US$ 15/month

Control Panel
LinuxPlesk TEN. x 10 Domains
WindowsPlesk TEN. x 10 Domains

Services
IP Addresses1 incl., as long as 4 possible
Reboot -> Power
Recovery -> Power
Backup -> Power
Reverse -> Power

Support
LevelPremium
Hotline
E-mail Ticket
FAQ

Prices
Monthly Basic Charge -> US$ 72. 99
Setup Payment -> US$ 199. 00 or perhaps US$ 16. 00/mo.
Contract period -> 1 month

I are not aware of if this is definitely Good or certainly not… Should i initiative Provider or not…

Quote: Yes, That looks as being a stable server in case you have good server software. other than so it should do okay for a magento internet store. I am not really a technical person… But i had been told that it can be Fully managed Server.

Quote: The server is most probably Unmanaged so you will have to know how to regulate a server that may include setting up, securing, optimizing, or anything else. I was told so it is Managed Server that’s y post doubt

Quote: It is hard to share with as the site will not say upfront whether it is completely managed or not necessarily. It just says “Premium Support”. If you know what you are usually doing, or feel comfortable managing your personal server then do it. Plus, there a wide range of “Server Management” providers to choose from such as Platinum Host Management. But most will require the application of cPanel.

The golden rule “You get what you pay out for”. I am not really a technical Person… Just have little knowledge related to server… i can not manage my machine…
But should the configuration stated below is wonderful for dedicated Server. What could be your suggestion

CPU
Type -> AMD Athlon II X4
Quantity -> Quad-Core
Clock Price -> 4x COUPLE OF. 3 GHz

Main Memory
Capacity -> EIGHT GB
Type -> DIMM (DDR3)

Hard Disks
Quantity -> 2
Capacity -> YOU, 000 GB
Type -> SATA, SOME, 400 rpm, EIGHT MB
RAID -> RAID YOU by software

Mainboard
Chipset -> AMD 785G
Network -> Broadcom BCM57780

Network
Data Copy -> unlimited
Type -> Flatrate
Switch Vent -> 100 MBit
External Joints -> over 160 GBit
Provider -> Deutsche Telekom, Degree 3, Global Crossing, cogent, DE-CIX, interoute,…
Uptime 99%

Operating System
Linux openSUSE, Dime OS, Ubuntu und Debian
Windows Webserver 2008 R2 + US$ 15/month

Control Panel
Linux Plesk TEN. x 10 Domains
Windows Plesk TEN. x 10 Domains

Services
IP Handles 1 incl., as long as 4 possible
Reboot -> Power
Recovery -> Power
Backup -> Power
Reverse -> Power

Support
Level Premium
Hotline
E-mail Ticket
FAQ

Prices
Monthly Basic Charge -> US$ 72. 99
Setup Payment -> US$ 199. 00 or perhaps US$ 16. 00/mo.
Contract period -> 1 month

<

Can someone please tell me if this is possible?

Howdy,

Basics: We have a Dedicated Equipment running VMWare.

I’d like and therefore run a webserver for a VM (CentOS and lighttpd) after which run a archive server (Not sure what design yet) on a different VM.

My concern is, how would I setup online server to serve from the home dir for the file server

Web Server has Public IP as well as a Private IP connected with 172. 1. ONE PARTICULAR. 10
File Equipment has NO Public IP and a Pribate IP involving 172. 1. A COUPLE OF. 10

Thank You!

You could established NFS on the file server, and have the world wide web server mount the actual exported directory.

Quote: You can set up NFS for the file server, and have the world wide web server mount the actual exported directory. Thanks on your reply. Would you advise this like a reliable solution

Quote: Thanks on your reply. Would you advise this like a reliable solutionWithout knowing the details within your application, I would simply recommend going greatest route and keeping the internet server and files on the single VM, that way there isn’t any overhead associated with running two os’s and the network latency/overhead of getting data pass among VMs.

If you want to go the double VM route, NFS would certainly be a efficient solution.

Thank you quite definitely for your assistance.

100tb location fee

Hello there,

Today i got going to get hold of server from 100tb and after this they are charging a good $100 fee intended for selecting a datacenter spot operated by SoftLayer. Personally i think really frustrated because of this, as i was gonna buy the same server the past week without the $100/month fee.

Now post don’t even want to try 100tb. Can anyone recommend any other dedicated server company with high bandwidth (1 Gbps)

Quote: Hello there,

Today i got going to get hold of server from 100tb and after this they are charging a good $100 fee intended for selecting a datacenter spot operated by SoftLayer. Personally i think really frustrated because of this, as i was gonna buy the same server the past week without the $100/month fee.

Now post don’t even want to try 100tb. Can anyone recommend any other dedicated server supplier with high bandwidth (1 Gbps) You should contact a number of providers and see what they are able to do for everyone including contacting 100TB and determine if they can help make an exception only for you

The joy of overselling….

Is this your monthly fee or a once fee

If this is the monthly fee subsequently that sure is usually a big increase, especially for their Ember host (50% increase).

Their layout with Softlayer need to of changed.

Quote: Their arrangement with Softlayer ought to of changed. Without a doubt, but after all it’s more realistic now that they’re at around 1USD / Mbit.
What 100TB seemed to be selling before (and still is their UT and UK DCs) is actually extremely oversold.

nope

they just boost the hardware specs of ember and various series

dont brief review any random bulcrap

look about 100tb. com first

the older ember got x3220 quadcore in the event that im not wrong and get 2x500gb only

now his or her ember series got a similar price with
E3-1230 8gbram in addition to 2x1tb

its not overselling, its reasonable price for me
(but it is still cheap for E3 series by using 2x1tb for 100tb Bandwith)

im sure in order the old ember or maybe other series

contact the sales to have the same selling price without adding 100$ regarding ex(Dallas)

renzuken08: Did you checked 100tb. com order form There’re charging $100 further for Amsterdam, Dallas, San Jose, Seattle along with Washington D. C

Quote: nope

they just boost the hardware specs of ember and various series

dont brief review any random bulcrap

look about 100tb. com first

the older ember got x3220 quadcore in the event that im not wrong and get 2x500gb only

now his or her ember series got a similar price with
E3-1230 8gbram in addition to 2x1tb

its not overselling, its reasonable price for me
(but it has the still cheap with regard to E3 series along with 2x1tb for 100tb Bandwith)

im sure in order the old ember or maybe other series

contact the sales to have the same value without adding 100$ for ex(Dallas)

yes i’m sure it

then pick london or saltlake city

its nonetheless cheap dude to get 201$ E3-1230 8gb ram memory 2x1tb 100tb

What location on earth do you prefer to become hosted in Since we are able to then help identify another provider In the event you cannot make an arrangement with 100tb in regards to the additional costs.

Sounds like they’re trying to get people to use their unique datacenters rather as compared with Softlayer.

It does good unfair indeed to need to pay $100 for locations but I am sure if you contact their sales reps they can provide you with deal or phone Tom100tb. com.

Quote: Howdy,

Today i used to be going to purchase a server from 100tb it’s true they are charging an extra $100 fee for selecting a datacenter position operated by SoftLayer. Many web hosting service providers, nothing against this specific company, are founded that they are nothing more that your financial schemes go by marketeers. Many “providers” usually do not even own the servers they market, but get from industry giants similar to SoftLayer. You will be surprised to understand how many with the popular “web hosting providers” shouldn’t have their own ASN, IP breathing space, infrastructure and own servers. Most of the people look at the actual hosting business as “everything like a service”.

bad decision from 100tb as well as the costs increased now

It appears it isn’t charging the payment anymore. They are generally just not providing the softlayer locations. I thought $100 for a location fee looked like it high so I needed to take a peek but I exclusively see London as well as Salt Lake these days.

Quote: It appears it isn’t charging the charge anymore. They are generally just not providing the softlayer locations. I thought $100 for a location fee looked like it high so I needed to take a peek but I exclusively see London as well as Salt Lake these days. Well it appears like they still have to update several pages on their how does someone reflect this switch of DC’s.

Which provider does offer 1gbit connection for cheap?

i need a server having dual xeon or maybe opteron, 24gb random access memory and 1gbit/s relationship in EU. just about any suggestions

What’s your budget

Check people providers:
limehost. ro
webtropia. com
hetzner. com
ovh. com

I think, that everything varies according to how many bandwidth you are going to use. Main and the majority important thing.

hetzner, ovh, leaseweb.

If you’ll need large amount connected with traffic – 100tb or even other companies

yesuphost. com presents gigabit line pertaining to cheap. I’ve possibly not used them and so I can’t opinion. I’ve been contemplating it for a different toy though

Edit: These are US though, because I can’t read.

There is very little such thing as cheap 1gbit network. You will receive what you finance.

If the worth is too good being true then its not only a 1gbit connection. For instance OVH provides 1gbit dedicated connections and you only get to use 10-13 TB of the 1gbit, after that your limited to 100 mbit for the other month.

I’ve been looking at SnelServer recently… WHEN I noticed they got a 1gbit up grade for 15/m.

Quote: Formerly suffering with tinnitus looking at SnelServer not too long ago… I noticed these people had a 1gbit up grade for 15/m. Do note that is definitely just for your uplink speed, it does not include any bandwidth beyond our default connected with 10 TB outgoing plus unmetered incoming.

1Gbps ports are neither rare nor particularly high priced, almost all website hosts can supply these people. The costly part is when you’d like to use these folks! Are you interested in 1gbps unmetered, 1gbps dedicated (not cheap…. ), or perhaps a set quantity of transfer on some sort of 1Gbps port.